Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 79 FSUPP2D 558 - Fanelle v. LoJack Corp.

Fanelle v. LoJack Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

1 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Relies on Hishon v. King & Spalding · Jenkins v. McKeithen · Pledger v. Medlock · Kirchberg v. Feenstra · Sinn v. Burd

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “One who gives publicity to a matter concerning another that places the other before the public in a false light is subject to liability to the other for invasion of his privacy if (a) the false light claim in which the other was placed would be highly offensive to a reasonable person, and (b) the actor had knowledge of or acted in reckless disregard as to the falsity of the publicized matter and the false light in which the other would be placed.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.