State v. Kinnane’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
59 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently December 2024 · most notably State v. Arceo (1996), State v. Wallace (1996)
59 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Kelekolio · State v. Hoey · State v. Alston · State v. Feliciano · State v. Sun Na Lee
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]t may be plain error for a trial court to fail to give an . . . instruction even when neither the prosecution nor the defendant have requested it . . . because . . . the ultimate responsibility properly to instruct the jury lies with the circuit court and not with trial counsel.”
9 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bovee. · State v. Mundon“`When jury instructions or the omission thereof are at issue on appeal, the standard of review is whether, when read and considered as a whole, the instructions given are prejudicially insufficient, erroneous, inconsistent, or misleading.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Klinge · State v. Sing“[a] person is guilty of an attempt to commit a crime if the person . . . Intentionally engages in conduct which, under the circumstances as the person believes them to be, constitutes a substantial step in a course of conduct intended to culminate in the person's commission of the crime.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sing · State v. Valentine
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.