Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 79 Idaho 314 - Buffat v. Schnuckle

Buffat v. Schnuckle’s Empirical Analysis

1957

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
March 1973
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 37 Cal. 2d 356 - Malloy v. Fong · 9 Cal. 2d 279 - McCann v. Hoffman · Martinez v. Southern Pacific Co. · Nepstad v. Lambert · Schumacher v. Leslie

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘The court may not weigh the evidence, or resolve the conflicts therein, or determine what conclusions should be drawn therefrom. That is the function of the jury, and the essence of a jury trial.’ ””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “■ “ ‘Generally speaking, within the meaning of such statutes, a guest is one who takes a ride in a car driven by another person, merely for his own pleasure or on his own business, and without making any return or conferring any benefit on the operator thereof; one who is carried in an automobile gratuitously, that is, one who gives no compensation for the carriage.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “■ “ '* * * to constitute one a passenger, not a guest, while the consideration need not be payment of money, there must be contributed by the passenger to the driver of the car something substantial and of worth to the driver, i. e., commercial, not mere courtesy.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.