¶1.Reference is made to Underwood v. Hosack, 38 Ill. 208; Daniel on Negotiable lusts., Vol. 1, Sec. 185; Parsons on Notes and Bills, Vol. 1, Chap. VI, 2d Ed., p. 195; Thompson v. Gray, 63 Me. 228.
79 Ill. App. 288
Harris v. Harris
Decided December 23, 1898
Appellate Court of Illinois · decided 1898-12-23
This case holds that a note given by a son at his father’s request, for the father’s existing debt, and made payable at a future day, is not void for want of consideration, and operated as a suspension of the right of appellee to enforce payment of the debt against the father.
Relies on Thompson v. Gray · Underwood v. Hossack
Decided 1898-12-23