79 Ill. App. 3d 532 - People v. Phipps’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 69 Ill. 2d 252 - People v. Jackson · 39 Ill. 2d 436 - The People v. Love · 50 Ill. 2d 136 - People v. Taylor · 40 Ill. 2d 62 - People Ex Rel. Stamos v. Jones · 63 Ill. 2d 364 - People v. Van De Rostyne
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In criminal cases the State may appeal only from an order or judgment the substantive effect of which results in dismissing a charge for any of the grounds enumerated in section 114 — 1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963; arresting judgment because of a defective indictment, information or complaint; quashing an arrest or search warrant; or suppressing evidence.” (Emphasis added.) 73 Ill. 2d R. 604(a)(1).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““[T]o the extent that section 10(b) attempts to provide for appeals from less than final judgment, it is an unconstitutional infringement by the legislature upon the rulemaking power of the supreme court and is therefore void.” (Phipps, 79 Ill. App. 3d at 537 , 398 N.E.2d at 653 .)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.