Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 79 ILLAPP3D 784 - People v. Davis

People v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
November 2006
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on First National Bank in Plant City v. Dickinson · 40 Ill. 2d 392 - The PEOPLE v. Raby · United States v. Woodard · 48 Ill. App. 3d 900 - People v. Gentry · 15 Ill. App. 3d 994 - City of Chicago v. Blakemore

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We think the defendant’s conduct falls squarely within the type of conduct intended to be proscribed by section 26 — 1(a) (1). Ill. Rev. Stat. 1977, ch. 38, par. 26 — 1(a)(1). A collateral contention raised by the defendant is that, in order to provoke a breach of the peace, an act must be performed in public view. We find this contention devoid of merit. A breach of the peace may as easily occur between two persons fighting in a deserted alleyway as it can on a crowded public street.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.