Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 79 IND 206 - Cooper v. State

Cooper v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1881

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
November 1968
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently November 1968

8 state decisions

40188118901900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Tuller · Gavin v. Shuman · Willey v. State · Heacock v. State · People v. Connor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Indictment copied in the record reveals the lack of the requisite endorsement. The defect is apparent upon an inspection of the pleading . . . The endorsement is made by statute an essential element of the indictment, and its absence is a defect for which a motion to quash will lie.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.