Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

79 Mass. 270

Craig v. Gisborne

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 15, 1859

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · decided 1859-09-15

Action of tort. The officer made this return upon the writ: “ Suffolk, ss. April 25,1859. By virtue of this writ, I have made diligent search for the within named Frederick N. Gisborne, but could neither find him nor any last and usual place of abode of his in my precinct, except on board of the steamer bound for Liverpool via Halifax, where he had taken passage, and was then hid away in some part of said steamer.

Decided 1859-09-15

Hoar, J.

¶1There was no service of the wilt in any manner authorized by law. The officer returns that he found no last and usual place of abode of the defendant; and the defendant’s berth in a steamer in which he had taken passage is clearly not such. There was no personal service, and the fact that he was hidden in the steamer is no reason for substituting for personal service the leaving of a copy where he might find it.

¶2Exceptions overruled»

/79/mass/270 · .json · Public domain