Commonwealth v. Sanchez’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
November 2016
most recently cited
4 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Powers v. Ohio · Commonwealth v. Soares · Commonwealth v. Flebotte · Cecil v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“received multiple versions of the instructions over two days”). On this record, we would be speculating if we concluded that the prosecutor struck Juror No. 201 because of any initial confusion at voir dire. 22 . The prosecutor allowed at least four jurors with high school (or less) educations to be seated. Four jurors listed their highest level of education as”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Sanchez v. Roden
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.