Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 79 MASSAPPCT 464 - Jones v. Boykan

Jones v. Boykan’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De Guinee · Olmstead v. United States · City of Riverside v. Rivera · United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. Espinosa

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “adequate notice of the complaint and a meaningful opportunity to be heard in answer to the claims raised.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “did not attend duly-noticed hearings, neglected to provide discovery, and offered no excuse for ignoring the case at hand.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.