Casey v. Casey’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
13
cited by 13 later decisions
3
states following
September 2022
most recently cited
13 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 1408 · 10 U.S.C. § 2771
Relies on McCarty v. McCarty · Mansell v. Mansell · Rose v. Rose · Fabre v. Walton · Opinions of the Justices to the House of Representatives
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Alimony and equitable division are interrelated remedies”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“viewing the financial award as a whole, including the treatment of the husband's ... pension as a stream of income, ... we conclude that [it] resulted in an inequitable award to the wife.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The guidelines and our case law leave the definition of income flexible, and the judge's discretion in its determination broad.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. McNamara v. McNamara
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.