79 Misc. 2d 1029 - Vincent v. Thompson’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · Commissioner v. Sunnen · Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois Foundation · 19 Cal. 2d 807 - Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving Association · Olga Zdanok v. The Glidden Company, Durkee Famous Foods Division, Frank T. Alexander v. The Glidden Company, Durkee Famous Foods Division
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a decision whether or not the (party) had a full and fair opportunity to establish (its position on an issue) in the prior action requires an exploration of the various elements which make up the realities of litigation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Winters v. Lavine“had more than adequate incentive to litigate long and hard.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Winters v. Lavine
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.