Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 79 NCAPP 477 - State v. Mason

State v. Mason’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Silhan · State v. Monk · 39 N.C. App. 256 - State v. Roper · 51 N.C. App. 387 - State v. Lednum · State v. Hill

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the circumstances of each case must be considered: for example, the extent of the threat to the victim; the physical stature of the knife wielder; the weakened state of the victim; or whether or not and to what extent the victim was actually injured. The circumstances of the case, rather than the physical description of the knife itself, ultimately determine this issue. ... Where the victim has in fact suffered serious bodily injury or death, the courts have consistently held that a knife is a dangerous or deadly weapon per se absent production [of the knife itself into evidence at trial] or [a] detailed description [of the knife via trial testimony].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.