79 N.C. App. 67 - Hill v. Hanes Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Watkins v. Central Motor Lines, Inc. · Pratt v. Central Upholstery Co. · Perry v. Hibriten Furniture Co. · North Carolina State Bar v. Sheffield · 65 N.C. App. 69 - Roper v. J. P. Stevens & Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[F]or purposes of G.S. Sec. 97-47, the statutory one-year period [now two years] for filing a claim for a change of condition begins at the time final payment is accepted, not when Form 28B is filed. Nonetheless, the Commission must be given the opportunity to determine whether a payment labeled “final” is or should be, in fact, the final payment. . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.