Engstrom v. Larson’s Empirical Analysis
1952
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently June 1995
2 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the obligation of the utmost good faith and integrity.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Robert W. Froemming, David D. Owen, Paul J. Sentman and Bruce F. Thompson v. Gate City Federal Savings and Loan Association, Robert W. Froemming, David D. Owen, Paul J. Sentman and Bruce F. Thompson v. Arvid P. Benson, Robert W. Froemming, David D. Owen, Paul J. Sentman and Bruce F. Thompson v. Sun Service Company, a North Dakota Corporation, Robert W. Froemming, David D. Owen, Paul J. Sentman and Bruce F. Thompson v. Warren T. Cowgill · Froemming v. Gate City Federal Savings & Loans Ass'n
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.