Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 79 N.J. 232 - In Re Kozlov

In Re Kozlov’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

151
cited by 151 later decisions
7
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

12 district · 135 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 151 later decisions — most recently March 2017 · most notably State v. Marshall (1991), State v. Williams (1988)

12 district · 135 state decisions

60019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Nixon · Branzburg v. Hayes · Maness v. Meyers · In Re Quinlan · Baird v. Koerner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 151 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]here must be a legitimate need ... to reach the evidence sought to be shielded.”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the trial judge, by a fair preponderance of the evidence including all reasonable inferences, that * * * the information * * * could not be secured from any less intrusive source.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]his is not necessarily because of any actual or provable prejudice to his case attributable to such juror, but rather because of his loss, by reason of that failure of disclosure, of the opportunity to have excused the juror by appropriate challenge, thus assuring with maximum possible certainty that he be judged fairly by an impartial jury.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.