79 N.J. Super. 1 - Sullivan v. Saylor’s Empirical Analysis
1963
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently May 2006
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Maddy v. Jones · 55 N.J. Super. 514 - Collins v. Yancey · 68 N.J. Super. 54 - Continos v. Parsekian
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The very language of the statutory definition suggests to us that the Legislature contemplated that, generally speaking, a prospective claimant would be either a `resident' of this State, or a `resident' of another, not of two states simultaneously.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“one may be a resident of this State within the intent and policy of the act although his domicile is elsewhere.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.