79 N.J. Super. 114 - Warrender v. Warrender’s Empirical Analysis
1963
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently January 1998 · most notably Newburgh v. Arrigo (1982), Heuer v. Heuer (1998)
3 federal appellate · 21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Fantony v. Fantony · Schlemm v. Schlemm · Staedler v. Staedler · Untermann v. Untermann · Tonti v. Chadwick
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is now settled that in deciding whether estoppel or unclean hands will apply in a particular set of facts the court will appraise the ‘total situation’ and will weigh the equities of the parties and others affected, as well as the interests of the State, with flexibility.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the faintest pretense of adjudication by the decree of either residence or domicile of either of them in Mexico when rendered.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“no basis for according greater recognition to a Mexican divorce on a one-day appearance than to the mail-order variety.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.