Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 79 N.J. Super. 379 - State v. West

79 N.J. Super. 379 - State v. West’s Empirical Analysis

1963

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
14
states following
November 2000
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 35 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently November 2000 · most notably United States of America Ex Rel. Frank Esola, 53517 v. Ronald M. Groomes, Superintendent (1975), Christian v. United States (1978)

8 federal appellate · 35 state decisions — followed in 14 states

21019631970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 79 N.J. Super. 270 - State v. Chirra · 62 N.J. Super. 70 - State v. Phillips · State v. Phillips · 104 N.J. Eq. 560 - In Re Cohen · 13 N.J. Super. 306 - In Re Application of Trignani

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . If trial is not had on any indictment, information or complaint contemplated hereby prior to the return of the prisoner to the original place of imprisonment, such indictment, information or complaint shall not be of any further force or effect, and the court shall enter an order dismissing the same with 'prejudice.” (Emphasis added.) 8”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “produce uncertainties which obstruct programs of prisoner treatment and rehabilitation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “is obviously remedial in character(,) . . . should be construed liberally in favor of (those whose problems were sought to be alleviated.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.