Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 79 N.M. 344 - State v. Tapia

State v. Tapia’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
2
states following
August 1986
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 38 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently August 1986 · most notably State v. Lopez (1969), State v. Rodriguez (1970)

2 federal appellate · 38 state decisions

180196819701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Wade · Simmons v. United States · State v. Lott · State v. Aull · State v. Manlove

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"`The doctrine of fundamental error is resorted to in criminal cases only if the innocence of the defendant appears indisputable, or if the question of his guilt is so doubtful that it would shock the conscience to permit his conviction to stand. State v. Sanders, 54 N.M. 369 , 225 P.2d 150 (1950). If there is a total absence of evidence to support a conviction, as well as evidence of an exculpatory nature, then an appellate court has the duty to see that substantial justice is done and to set aside the conviction. State v. Salazar, 78 N.M. 329 , 431 P.2d 62 (1967). * * *'"”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.