Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 79 N.M. 640 - State v. Cochran

State v. Cochran’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
2
states following
March 2001
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently March 2001 · most notably Smith v. State (1976), State v. Ford (1970)

2 federal appellate · 29 state decisions

25019681970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hurtado v. People of the State of California · State v. Franklin · Benito Lovato v. State of New Mexico · Territory of New Mexico v. Lobato · State v. Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The rule has been firmly established . . . that a motion for continuance rests within the sound discretion of the trial court and its ruling will not be disturbed unless the record shows an abuse of discretion .... The motion was denied because the appellant failed to show diligence in attempting to secure the witnesses. . . . He had known for well over a month the need for calling the witnesses but had made no attempt to ascertain their availability prior to trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “. . any person found guilty of murder in the second degree or of any degree of manslaughter shall be punished according to the verdict of the jury, although the evidence in the case shows him to be guilty of a higher degree of homicide; and no judgment shall be stayed, arrested or in any manner affected because the evidence shows or tends to show the accused guilty of a higher degree of the offense than that of which he is convicted.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.