Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 79 N.M. 715 - State v. Mears

State v. Mears’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
June 2004
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently June 2004

10 state decisions

6019681970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cox v. Hart · Lewis v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. · Reynolds v. United States · 128 Cal. App. 2d 113 - Holt v. Morgan · State v. Luna

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is well settled that a statute does not operate retroactively merely because some of the facts or conditions upon which its application depends came into existence prior to the enactment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.