State v. Gutierrez’s Empirical Analysis
1968
Citation profile
37 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently August 1988 · most notably State v. Lewis (1969), State v. Lopez (1969)
37 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · State v. Billstrom · State v. Roy · State v. Ortega · State v. Williams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * One of the issues which the state had the burden of establishing was the identity of the accused as one of the four persons who perpetrated the offense. “Admittedly, reference to other offenses during the course of trial is error, unless such evidence is received for one of the purposes recognized as exceptions to the general rule. “One of the exceptions recognizing the admissibility of evidence of other crimes is that which serves to establish the identity of the person charged and who is on trial. State v. Lord, 42 N.M. 638 , 84 P.2d 80 (1938); State v. Roy, 40 N.M. 397 , 60 P.2d 646 , 110 A.L.R. 1 (1936). The testimony of the former assault assisted in establishing identity of appellant as a member of a group. The matter of identity was of crucial importance because alibi was injected as a defense.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Turner“After the trial court determined that the confession was voluntary the issue was then submitted to the jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gruender
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.