In Re Nelson’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently August 2002
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Van Orman v. Nelson · Iriart v. Johnson · In Re Morris · State ex rel. Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v. Gudmundsen · 232 Mo. App. 478 - In the Matter of Sharon J. Pate
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The objection is not well taken. The transcript was admittedly correct and complete, it is fully proper, and, if admissible for no other reason, it is certainly admissible .as an admission by a party against his interest and therefore competent evidence. . . .” (p. 781.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Turner“the protection of the public, the profession, and the administration of justice, and not the punishment of the person disciplined”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Byrnes
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.