People v. Dokes’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 23 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently November 2016 · most notably 123 Wash. 2d 296 - Matter of Personal Restraint of Lord (1994), 650 So. 2d 1289 - MacK v. State (1994)
3 federal appellate · 23 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In determining whether a defendant has a right to be present during a particular proceeding, a key factor is whether the proceeding involved factual matters about which defendant might have peculiar knowledge that would be useful in advancing the defendant's or countering the People's position.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“point out errors in the DCJS report, to controvert assertions by the prosecutor with respect to uncharged acts and to provide counsel with details about the underlying facts of both charged and uncharged acts”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Monclavo“the potential for meaningful participation by the defendant”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Monclavo
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.