79 Ohio App. 3d 120 - Prosen v. Dimora’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
44 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently November 2023 · most notably State ex rel. Edwards v. Toledo City School District Board of Education (1995), 108 Ohio App. 3d 637 - Lakota Local School District Board of Education v. Brickner (1996)
44 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on O'Brien v. University Community Tenants Union, Inc. · Mitchell v. Lawson Milk Co. · Greeley v. Miami Valley Maintenance Contractors, Inc. · Fortner v. Thomas · State ex rel. Bush v. Spurlock
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘ “1. The review of proceedings of administrative officers and agencies, authorized by Section 4(B), Article IV of the Ohio Constitution, contemplates quasi-judicial proceedings only, and administrative actions of administrative officers and agencies not resulting from quasi-judicial proceedings are not appealable to the Court of Common Pleas under the provisions of R.C. 2506.01. (Fortner v. Thomas, 22 Ohio St.2d 13 [ 51 O.O.2d 35 , 257 N.E.2d 371 (1970) ], approved and followed.” ’ ” 79 Ohio App.3d at 125 , 606 N.E.2d at 1053 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““ * * * An unclassified employee is not afforded the protection of the civil service regulations. See State ex rel. Canfield v. Frost (1990), 53 Ohio St.3d 13 , 557 N.E.2d 1206 . “Appellant contends that the trial court had subject-matter jurisdiction to hear his appeal under R.C. 2506.01. We disagree. As the Ohio Supreme Court stated in State ex rel. Rieke v. Hausrod (1979), 59 Ohio St.2d 48, 49 , 13 O.O.3d 35, 35-36 , 391 N.E.2d 736 , 737:”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.