Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 79 Ohio App. 3d 589 - State v. Humphries

79 Ohio App. 3d 589 - State v. Humphries’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
1
states following
November 2025
most recently cited

51 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently November 2025 · most notably State v. Richcreek (2011), State v. Lukacs (2010)

51 state decisions

3001992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Adams · In re Martin-Trigona · State v. Eley · State v. Boston · Wisconsin v. Illinois

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[t]he controlling factor is whether the declaration was made under such circumstances as would reasonably show that it resulted from impulse rather than reason and reflection.'”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(1) the lapse of time between the event and the declaration; (2) the mental and physical condition of the declarant; (3) the nature of the statement; and (4) the influence of intervening circumstances.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““Records, reports, statements, or data compilations, in any form, of public offices or agencies, setting forth (a) the activities of the office or agency, or (b) matters observed pursuant to duty imposed by law as to which matters there was a duty to report, excluding, however, in criminal cases matters observed by police officers and other law enforcement personnel, unless offered by defendant, unless the sources of information or other circumstances indicate lack of trustworthiness.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.