79 Ohio App. 3d 600 - State v. McSwain’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently May 2013
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Jenks · 20 Ohio App. 3d 172 - State v. Martin · State v. Eley · State v. Coleman · 5 Ohio App. 3d 13 - State v. Mabry
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“R.C. 2911.01 , by making reference to a `theft offense' in R.C. 2913.01 , incorporates the `knowingly' standard of culpability from the theft statute.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Under R.C. § 2923.03 , a person may be an accomplice in an offense and prosecuted as the principal offender if . . . he aids or abets another in committing the offense while acting with the kind of culpability required for commission of the offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“No person, in attempting or committing a theft offense . . . or in fleeing immediately after the attempt or offense, shall do any of the following: . . . (3) Inflict, or attempt to inflict, serious physical harm on another.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.