79 Ohio App. 3d 667 - State v. Caldwell’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
741 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 741 later decisions — most recently August 2025 · most notably 127 Ohio App. 3d 328 - State v. Long (1998), 124 Ohio App. 3d 468 - Rogers v. Hill (1998)
741 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Bagley · State v. Jenks · United States v. Young · State v. Dehass · Seasons Coal Co. v. City of Cleveland
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 741 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) that he was not at fault in creating the situation giving rise to the affray, (2) that he had a bona fide belief that he was in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm and that his only means of escape from such danger was in the use of deadly force, and (3) that he did not violate any duty to retreat or avoid the danger.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“We conclude the trier of fact, in resolving the conflicts in the evidence, did not create a manifest miscarriage of justice so as to require a new trial. Viewing this evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution, we further conclude that a rational trier of fact could have found beyond a reasonable doubt that appellant possessed marijuana and LSD and that appellant knew or has reasonable cause to believe that the marijuana was intended for sale or resale by the offender or another person.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“is owed deference since the trier of fact is `best able to view the witnesses and observe their demeanor, gestures and voice inflections, and use these observations in weighing the credibility of the proffered testimony.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.