Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 79 Ohio App. 3d 705 - State v. Howard

79 Ohio App. 3d 705 - State v. Howard’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

69
cited by 69 later decisions
1
states following
December 2022
most recently cited

69 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 69 later decisions — most recently December 2022 · most notably 108 Ohio App. 3d 598 - State v. Mays (1996), 172 Ohio App. 3d 666 - State v. Masters (2007)

69 state decisions

2901992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Knapp v. Edwards Laboratories · Pollard v. United States · Dickey v. Florida · United States v. Mauro · State v. Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The time within which an accused must be brought to trial, or in the case of felony, to preliminary hearing and trial, may be extended only by the following: “(A) Any period during which the accused is unavailable for hearing or trial, by reason of other criminal proceedings against him, within or outside the state, by reason of his confinement in another state, or by reason of the pendency of extradition proceedings, provided that the prosecution exercises reasonable diligence to secure his availability.””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The time [in which the state must bring a defendant to trial] may be tolled by certain events delineated in R.C. 2945.72 (E) and (H), including continuances granted as a result of defense motions and any reasonable continuance granted other than upon the request of the accused.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “(2) Shall be brought to trial within two hundred seventy days after his arrest. {¶ 19}”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.