79 Ohio App. 3d 772 - State v. McDermott’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently March 2013
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Post · 89 F. Supp. 357 - United States v. United Shoe MacHinery Corporation · In re Sealed Case · Weil v. Investment/Indicators, Research & Management, Inc. · In re Sealed Case
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The following persons shall not testify in certain respects: "(A) An attorney, concerning a communication made to him by his client in that relation or his advice to his client, except that the attorney may testify by express consent of the client * * * and except that, if the client voluntarily testifies * * * the attorney may be compelled to testify on the same subject.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. McDermott
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.