Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

79 Ohio St. 3d 153

In re Mitchell

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1997

Ohio Supreme Court · decided 1997-06-25

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently December 2006

13 state decisions

Relies on In re Bower

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1997-06-25

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1Admission to the practice of law in Ohio requires the applicant “ to establish by clear and convincing evidence the applicant’s present character, fitness, and moral qualifications for admission to the practice of law in Ohio.” Gov.Bar R. I(12)(C)(6). See In re Application of Bower (1992), 65 Ohio St.3d 429, 431, 605 N.E.2d 6, 7.

¶2After reviewing the evidence, we agree with the findings and conclusions of the board. At this time, Mitchell has too many unresolved matters relating to his character and fitness to warrant being authorized to take the July 1998 bar examination. The additional delay recommended by the board will provide Mitchell with an opportunity to resolve these pending matters.

¶3We therefore adopt the recommendation of the board.

¶4Judgment accordingly.

*155Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
/79/ohiost3d/153 · .json · Public domain