Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

79 Ohio St. 3d 51

Jackson v. Rose

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1997

Ohio Supreme Court · decided 1997-06-18

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently August 2000

19 state decisions

Relies on State v. Pless

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1997-06-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1Jackson asserts that the court of appeals erred in dismissing his habeas corpus petition. As the court of appeals held, however, the failure to comply with R.C. 2945.05 may be remedied only in a direct appeal from a criminal conviction. State v. Pless (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 333, 658 N.E.2d 766, paragraph two of the syllabus. A claimed violation of R.C. 2945.05 is not the proper subject for habeas corpus relief. 74 Ohio St.3d at 339, 658 N.E.2d at 770.

¶2Based on the foregoing, the court of appeals properly dismissed Jackson’s habeas corpus petition. Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.

¶3Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
/79/ohiost3d/51 · .json · Public domain