Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

79 Ohio St. 3d 52

In re Nemec

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1997

Ohio Supreme Court · decided 1997-06-18

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently December 1998

5 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1997-06-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1We accept the findings and conclusions of the board, but believe that applicant should demonstrate his freedom from substance abuse for a longer period before being permitted to sit for the bar examination. We therefore order that applicant be permitted to reapply to take the July 1998 bar examination, to coincide with the approximate date of the conclusion of his two-year contract with OLAP.

¶2Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.Douglas and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.
/79/ohiost3d/52 · .json · Public domain