Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 79 Okla. 248 - Hunter v. Battiest

Hunter v. Battiest’s Empirical Analysis

1920

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
3
states following
November 2002
most recently cited

31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently November 2002 · most notably Suagee v. Cook (1995), In Re Estate of Holcomb (2002)

31 state decisions

60192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. Gerold · Bilby v. Stewart · Gidney v. Chappell · Barker v. Wiseman · McTaggart v. Thompson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ When the legal presumption of undue influence has arisen by showing confidential relations, whether in dispositions of property inter vivos or by will, the burden of proof is upon the party seeking to take the benefit of such disposition to rebut the presumption attaching thereto by showing either a severance of the confidential relations, or that the party making the disposition had competent and independent advise in regard thereto.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Where one stands in the relationship of attorney to the testator at the time the will is made, and is also the principal beneficiary under the will, the fiduciary relationship being of the highest trust, the law indulges in the presumption that undue influence was used to procure the will, and the burden is on such beneficiary to show the contrary.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.