Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 79 Okla. 262 - Potts v. Zolinger

Potts v. Zolinger’s Empirical Analysis

1920

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
April 1952
most recently cited

30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently April 1952 · most notably Commercial Drilling Co. v. Kennedy (1935), Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. Richards (1923)

30 state decisions

2401920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dodson Williams v. Parsons · Planters' Cotton & Ginning Co. v. Penny · Wichita Falls & N. W. Ry. Co. v. Gant · Midland Valley R. Co. v. Kersey · Hunter v. Jaynes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'‘Where there is competent evidence tending to show damages alleged, and the verdict is not excessive, and when the complaining party does not request the trial court to give an instruction correctly stating the measure of damages, a cause will not be reversed because the. court’s charge does not accurately define the measure of damages.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.