79 Okla. Crim. 31 - Murphy v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1944
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently December 1983
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Myers · People v. Pineda · 66 Okla. Crim. 127 - Wheeler v. State · 71 Okla. Crim. 99 - Snider v. State · 6 Okla. Crim. 350 - Sharp v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Where intent is necessary in the commission of a crime, it is a question for the jury, under all the facts and circumstances, of each individual case. It may be proved by direct or circumstantial evidence."”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage““It is true that it is the duty of the court to submit to the jury every degree of assault which the evidence in any reasonable view of it suggests. But there is nothing in the evidence here that indicates an assault and battery. The weapon here used was a deadly weapon per se.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jennings v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.