Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 79 Or. App. 238 - Smith v. Piluso

79 Or. App. 238 - Smith v. Piluso’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
March 1989
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Generally, a time-essence provision in a mortgage or land sale contract is for the benefit of the one entitled to performance, usually payment. If a payment is not made on time, the mortgagee or vendor may foreclose without notice and opportunity to cure `by force of the contract itself,' Hays v. Hug, 243 Or 175 , 412 P2d 373 (1966); Gray v. Pelton, 67 Or 239 , 135 P 755 (1913), unless the time-essence provision has been waived by the acceptance of late payments. Stinemeyer v. Wesco Farms, Inc., 260 Or 109 , 487 P2d 65 (1971). If it has been waived, it may be reinstated by notice that payments must be made promptly in the future and that, if they are not, the principal balance will become due immediately and the mortgage or contract foreclosed."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.