79 Or. App. 801 - State v. Rowe’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently April 2018
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An attorney's presence at custodial interrogations is one way to secure the right to be free from compelled self incrimination. For this reason we require the police to inform a detained person that he may terminate questioning at any time and that he may have an attorney to advise him before he speaks.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“"the Oregon constitutional right against self incrimination is presently protected by the same warnings which the United States Supreme Court requires under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments * * *." State v. Rowe, 79 Or.App. 801, 804 , 720 P.2d 765 , rev. den. 302 Or. 86 , 726 P.2d 1185 (1986).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[A]s long as the text of the federal Miranda warnings remains the law, we think that the convenience of a single text exceeds any gain from improving that text.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.