Larson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently January 2025
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Tanner v. United States · 27 Cal. 4th 1230 - People v. Steele · United States v. Williams-Davis · United States v. Campbell · United States v. Murphy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“we have no doubt that there are many trials in which one or more members of a jury prematurely remark on the credibility of the testimony they have heard or express some opinion about the anticipated outcome of the case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Barr v. State“to insulate the deliberative process and to promote finality of verdicts while not foreclosing testimony as to the sic forces erroneously injected into the process”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“the admissibility of juror affidavits under Rule 606(b) turns on the type of impropriety they describe, not the timing of that impropriety.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Larson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.