Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 79 SO2D 696 - Hicks v. Kemp

Hicks v. Kemp’s Empirical Analysis

1955

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
September 1991
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently September 1991

8 state decisions

2019551960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Magarian v. Southern Fruit Distributors · 71 So. 2d 480 - Bartholf v. Baker · Holstun & Son v. Embry · Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Pixler · 40 So. 2d 122 - Taylor v. Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “because of the danger of giving legal sanction to an effort on the part of an employer to avoid provisions of the [Workmen's Compensation] Act by creating the appearance of employing only independent contractors when for all practical purposes a master-servant relationship actually exists.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.