Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 79 SO3D 208 - Thompson v. State

Thompson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 838 So. 2d 554 - Butler v. State · 6 So. 3d 99 - Horne v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'The sentence required by the Code is the minimum permissible sentence and no more.’ ” Thompson v. State, 79 So.3d 208, 208 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (quoting Horne v. State, 6 So.3d 99, 101 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009), and citing Butler v. State, 838 So.2d 554, 556 (Fla.2003) (holding that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.