Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 79 SO3D 347 - Nesbitt v. Nesbitt

Nesbitt v. Nesbitt’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 869 So. 2d 114 - Ramey v. DeCaire · Lewis v. CHATEAU D'ARBONNE NURSE CARE CTR. · Fontelieu v. Fontelieu · 721 So. 2d 34 - Gandy v. United Services Auto. Ass'n · Vidrine v. Teche Electric Supply, L.L.C.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Although an appeal or answer to the appeal is required for appellate review and modification of the trial court’s award of damages, the issue of frivolous appeal first arises at the appellate court level and therefore may be adjudicated and remedied by this court. The jurisprudence has also determined that when an issue of attorney’s fees is present in the case, it is within the appellate court’s discretion to award or increase attorney’s fees for the expense of the appeal regardless of whether the appellee an swered the appeal. La. C.C.P. art. 2164; Gandy v. United Services Auto Assoc., 97-1095 (La.App.5th Cir.10/14/98), 721 So.2d 34 ; Smith v. Pilgrim’s Pride Corp., 44,080 (La.App.2d Cir.2/25/09), 4 So.3d 983 , writ denied, 09-0961 (La.6/19/09), 10 So.3d 739 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.