Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

79 So. 3d 747

Akbar v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2011-05-02

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently August 2016

6 state decisions

Relies on 808 So. 2d 210 - Knight v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2011-05-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Appellant seeks review of the trial court’s order summai'ily denying his rule 3.800(a) motion. We affirm.

¶2This is at least the ninth postconviction motion filed by Appellant concerning his 1989 conviction. The exact same claim raised in the current motion has been denied multiple times by the trial court, and this court affirmed the denial of this claim on the merits in Akbar v. State, 808 So.2d 215 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) (table). Accordingly, we find this appeal to be frivolous and direct the Clerk to forward a certified copy of this opinion to the Department of Corrections for appropriate disciplinary action pursuant to section 944.279, Florida Statutes.

¶3AFFIRMED.

DAVIS, LEWIS and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.
/79/so3d/747 · .json · Public domain