Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 79 So. 3d 849 - Dill v. State

79 So. 3d 849 - Dill v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
October 2016
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · 761 So. 2d 1055 - Freeman v. State · 39 So. 3d 252 - State v. Montgomery · 496 So. 2d 798 - Pope v. Wainwright · 759 So. 2d 650 - Thompson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]hether the alleged omissions are of such magnitude as to constitute a serious error or substantial deficiency falling measurably outside the range of professionally acceptable performance and, second, whether the deficiency in performance compromised the appellate process to such a degree as to under mine confidence in the correctness of the result.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.