Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 79 SW3D 141 - Lattrell v. Chrysler Corp.

Lattrell v. Chrysler Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
December 2012
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 336th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Gulbenkian v. Penn · Moreno v. Sterling Drug, Inc. · Harwell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. · Tenneco Inc. v. Enterprise Products Co. · Peeler v. Hughes & Luce

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When a party cannot show a material fact issue, there is nothing to submit to a jury[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.