Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 79 TEX 246 - Dugan v. Lewis

Dugan v. Lewis’s Empirical Analysis

1891

Citation profile

124
cited by 124 later decisions
11
states following
November 1999
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 4 district · 88 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 124 later decisions — most recently November 1999 · most notably Stuart v. Spademan (1985), Shropshire v. Commerce Farm Credit Co. (1930)

14 federal appellate · 4 district · 88 state decisions — followed in 11 states

57018911900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 124 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The stipulation is to be'construed as a penalty which will not be enforced except upon canceling the unearned interest notes, and' that it does not make the contract usurious.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““It is contended that, as the deed of trust provides that, on failure of the borrower to pay said note or either of said coupons, or failure to comply with any of the stipulations contained in said deed of trust, the whole sum of money secured thereby may, without notice to the borrower, at the option of the lender or his assigns, and at his option only, be declared due and payable at once, and the trustee was authorized to take possession and sell the land; and as default was made in the payment of the coupon due December 1, 1S87, and the whole amount was declared due, the whole five years’ interest became collectable according to the terms of the contract long before the termination of the five years, thus making the interest reserved greater on the happening of the contingency than 12 per cent, per annum, and the contract usurious under the laws of this state.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “making the principal of the note become due at the option of the holder”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.