Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 79 U.S. 31 - The Maria Martin

The Maria Martin’s Empirical Analysis

79 U.S. 31 · 1870

Citation profile

115
cited by 115 later decisions
13
cited 13 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
October 1998
most recently cited

56 federal appellate · 15 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 115 later decisions (13 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 1998 · most notably The New York (1899), Morley Const Co v. Maryland Casualty Co (1937)

56 federal appellate · 15 district · 3 state decisions

1901870188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 115 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Appeals under the additional act ‘to amend the judicial system’ are subject to the same rules, regulations, and restrictions ás are prescribed in case of writs of error. Both parties in a civil action may sue out a writ of error to a final judgment, but where one party exercises the right the other cannot assign error in the appellate court. * * * Where each party appeals each may assign error, but where only one party appeals the other is bound by the decree in the court below, and he cannot assign error in the appellate-court, nor can he be heard if the proceedings in the appeal are correct, except in support of. the decree from which the appeal of the other party is taken.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “"Where the officers and crew of the tow, as well as the officers and crew of the tug. participate in tire navigation of the vessels, and a collision with another vessel ensues, the tug alone, or the tow alone, or both jointly, may be liable for the consequences, according to the circumstances, as the one or the other, or both jointly, were either deficient in skill or were culpably inattentive or negligent in the performance of their duties.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.