Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 79 U.S. 681 - Bronson's Executor v. Chappell

Bronson's Executor v. Chappell’s Empirical Analysis

79 U.S. 681 · 1870

Citation profile

72
cited by 72 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
13
states following
March 2010
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 2 district · 28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 72 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2010 · most notably Norton v. Shelby County (1886), More v. Steinbach (1888)

17 federal appellate · 2 district · 28 state decisions — followed in 13 states

110187018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Where one, without objection, suffers another to do acts which proceed upon the ground of authority from him, or by his conduct adopts and sanctions such acts after they are done, he will be bound, although no previous authority exist, in all respects as if the requisite power had been given in the most formal manner. If he has justified the belief of a third party that the person assuming to be his agent was authorized to do what was done, it is no answer for him to say that no authority had been given, or that it did not reach so far, and that the third party had acted upon a mistaken conclusion. He is estopped to take refuge in such a defense. If a loss is to be borne, the author of the error must bear it.””
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.