Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

79 Va. 522

Saunders v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided October 7, 1884

Supreme Court of Virginia · decided 1884-10-07

Saunders, to an indictment against him for petit larceny. The pleas averred that the accused, before said indictment was found, had been put upon his trial upon a warrant charging him with the same offence as alleged in the indictment, before certain justices of said county having jurisdiction of the alleged offence; and that the said justices heard the case on its merits by hearing the evidence adduced by the commonwealth and by the accused, and the argument of counsel, and…

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently November 1996

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1884-10-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Lewis, P.,

¶1delivered the opinion of the court:

¶2The plaintiff in error was indicted in the county court of Eockingham county for petit larceny. He appeared and filed a plea of “once in jeopardy” for the same offence, which was after-wards, on the motio'n of the attorney for the commonwealth, stricken out by the court as insufficient in law. He thereupon tendered a second plea of the same nature, which the court rejected. And this action of the court he assigns as error.

¶3From the transcript of the record which accompanies the petition, it does not appear that a final judgment has been pronounced in the case, or that the case has progressed further than the order of the court rejecting the second plea tendered by the defendant. In a criminal case, a writ of error lies only to a final judgment, and as no such judgment has been pronounced in the present case, it follows that the writ of error must he dismissed as improvidently awarded.

¶4Writ of error dismissed.

/79/va/522 · .json · Public domain